Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2005 [OLD VERSION]

Software : Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2005 [OLD VERSION]

Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2005 [OLD VERSION]

from: Microsoft Software



 : Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2005 [OLD VERSION]
See Larger Image







Binding: CD-ROM
Brand: Microsoft
EAN: 0882224058919
Format: CD-ROM
Label: Microsoft Software
Manufacturer: Microsoft Software
Model: C5E-00001
Publisher: Microsoft Software
Release Date: 2005-11-28
Studio: Microsoft Software



Editorial Review:






Features:
  • Complete development environment with comprehensive application development features, including improved visual designers, code editors, and programming languages for optimum productivity.
  • Develop and debug multi-tier server applications from with the unified development enviroment - even remotely.
  • Build tools that extend the Visual Studio Integrated Development enviroment using the Visual Studio Software Developers Kit.





Accessories:
     see more

Accessories:






Related Items:
     see more

Related Items:



banned interdit verboden prohibido vietato proibido
  banned    interdit    verboden   vietato     prohibido    verboden  banned      vietato      interdit proibido   vietato       interdit      verboden      banned  prohibido   

Your IP has been blocked. Please perform the action below to regain access.

Code:  security image
Please enter the Code: 



Customer Reviews
Average Rating:  out of 5 stars

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - Good IDE but Poor Choice for Older C++ Code
Like other reviewers, I have found that older C and C++ projects (VS2003, VC++6, etc) usually will not work with Visual Studio 2005. You'll get tons of compile errors and warnings, unresolved linker symbols, etc. and you will spend a LOT of time changing your program to make it work, if you can make it work at all. And the import wizard did not help much in this respect.

Also, I found it troubling that there are a lot of nice formatting and Intellisense options for C#, but not for C++. There is some rudimentary formatting and Intellisense functionality for C++, but it is much more limited than what you get for C#. So, one of the nice features of VS is missing for C++. Why? It seems this is the MS way of getting us to use their chosen language, C#. It certainly makes me wonder about the future of C++ at Microsoft.

That said, there are still lots of nice features in Visual Studio 2005, and for new C++ projects its not too bad (except for limited formatting and IntelliSense functionality). I could get new projects up and running quickly and painlessly, and I liked the many build/debug features used in VS2005.



Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Worst Visual Studio ever Published
If you are starting from scratch; this may work.

But if you have thousands of lines of C++ code that you'd like to port to the new runtime, forget about this crap.

This code has compiled in Visual Studio 2002 and 2003 with only minor adjustments. Upgrading to 2005 has been basically a brick wall.

I attempted the port. After a few dozen iterations, I started hitting problems with attributed ATL service classes that could not resolve base class references. Code that is executed in the compiled binary in the previous release; but that this new compiler reports as missing. And I still have 89 errors. Since I don't have the source, I cannot fix this with any kind of macro. Nice box you've painted me into Microsoft. The upgrade is not important enough for me to mess with this stuff. I have a deadline end of month.



Rating: 4 out of 5 stars - Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2005
Although I have not used the product as much as I would like, from installation to using the help documentation, I believe I will benifit in upgrading from the Microsoft Visual Basic 6 product. Lots of good improvements.



Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Only game in town
I don't find the product as easy to work with as its predecessors, but this is the way Microsoft is pushing application development, so it is a "must-have".



Rating: 3 out of 5 stars - Almost there...
This is the best Visual Studio in awhile, but its still not there yet (especially for C++ developers, but its closer). On the positive side, C++ developers now have the cleaner syntax of C++ / CLI (there are battles raging about that name) which apparently is on a fast-track ISO certification. We shall see what happens. On the downside: still no STL / CLR dotNET. However, MS has a beta for DL, but its containers are not compatible with dotNET (yet). Good idea to stick with C# until this is fixed.

The UI tools continue to soar ahead for all the dotNET languages, and I don't see any difference between C++ and the others in that department anymore.
VB and C# both pick up edit & continue, good for me `cause I like grew used to it in C++. Call graphing is still only in C++.
The IDE UI is tabbed, and has line revision colors on all languages. Line numbering is optional, as always, but its still simply absolute lines (not code lines). This can be a pain going cross-platform with C++.

Datatips are pretty capable and improved, and can drill down into containers easily.
The help system is pretty much a flood. Too much information, and there is no way to directly determine where its pulling its information from. This bites when you have multiple Visual Studios & associated MSDNs & would like confirmation that its pulling the collections correctly.

As for the packaging, Visual Studio 2005 Professional edition comes with 2 product CDs, 3 MSDN CDs, and a Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition DVD, a small product guide booklet, and two posters (one thats useless, and one of dotNET 2.0 namespaces).

3-stars, as the help system needs some work, and VC++ lacks an effective STL under dotNET.
Here's hoping for VS2007:)



read more customer reviews on Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2005 [OLD VERSION]


 



  widescreen yv
Digital Camera  Reviews




Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."

I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.

I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.

I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.

I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.

Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.

There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.

Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants. 

[a klog apart]


Blindspots is a continually-updated collection of movie reviews based around one very interesting concept -- how accessible they are to the visually impaired.
Movies that score high in accessibility include "The American President" (10/10) and "Ghosts of Mississippi" (9/10). At the other end of the scale are "101 Dalmatians", "Buddy", and "Spawn", each receiving 2/10.

Java Entrepreneur

Sun Microsystems has announced plans to cut between 5,000 and 6,000 jobs — that's between 15 and 18 percent of its workforce.

"It blamed the cuts on the global economic downturn, but I think that like many other companies, Sun is using the downturn as an excuse for what were pre-existing problems, foretold by its stock price, which seems to be in an unending swoon," suggests GigaOM's Om Malik.

"How much has Sun spent to develop Solaris or Java?" asks InfoWorld's Neil McAllister. "How much must it continue to invest in maintaining other products, which, despite being open source, have no appreciable development community? To say these products are not loss leaders suggests something akin to Hollywood accounting."

The answer? "Spin off Java," McAllister added in a later post. "Just get rid of it — farm it out to an industry consortium and let the companies that depend upon it manage it..."

More here from CNET News ... more here from the Guardian ... more here from ZDNet ... more here from TG Daily ... and the press release is here.

See full article.

Related Entries:

Sun Microsystems Comes Up With RFID Based Java Net Community Website - 14 May 2006

Welcome 2007 with Open-Source Java - 25 October 2006

EarthLink Fires Half of its Workforce - 28 August 2007

Sprint is Bleeding - 18 January 2008




Contents of this feed are a property of Creative Weblogging Limited and are protected by copyright laws. Violations will be prosecuted. Please email us if you'd like to use this feed for non-commercial activities at feeds - at - creative-weblogging.com.






Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2005 [OLD VERSION]

Shopping