Microsoft Visual SourceSafe 2005 Upgrade

Software : Microsoft Visual SourceSafe 2005 Upgrade

Microsoft Visual SourceSafe 2005 Upgrade

from: Microsoft Software



 : Microsoft Visual SourceSafe 2005  Upgrade
See Larger Image

List Price: $279.00
Our Price: $258.99
You Save: -$20.01 ( 7%)
Prices subject to change.


Availability: Usually ships in 2 to 3 days




Binding: CD-ROM
Brand: Microsoft
EAN: 0882224058889
Format: CD-ROM
Label: Microsoft Software
Manufacturer: Microsoft Software
Model: 324-00503
Platform: Windows XP
Publisher: Microsoft Software
Release Date: 2005-11-28
Studio: Microsoft Software



Editorial Review:

Product Description

Visual SourceSafe is the ideal version control system for any development team using Microsoft Visual Studio .NET. Historically, problems within the team development environment stem from the inability to work comfortably in a setting sensitive to their projects and source code. It's simple - no complex setup or installation is required to try out Visual SourceSafe running in the full-featured MSDN Virtual Lab.



Main Features
  • Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation
  • Manufacturer Part Number: 324-00503
  • Manufacturer Website Address: www.microsoft.com
  • Software Sub Type: Project Management/Version Control
  • Software Name: Visual SourceSafe 2005 - Upgrade
  • Features & Benefits:

    Enhanced Performance and Stability:
  • In support of database performance, Visual SourceSafe has increased data storage to 4 GB, and has enlarged archive limits. The file retrieval operation is two times faster than in older versions.
  • Visual SourceSafe reduces the need to analyze, administer, and repair databases. It is compatible and interoperable with version 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 databases.




  • Support for Larger Projects and Distributed Teams:
  • Regional Time Zones
  • Multiple Languages
  • Unicode


  • When you developed XML Web services created using ASP.NET with previous versions of Visual SourceSafe, all XML files, such as Web.config, *.wsdl, *.disco, and *.map files, were stored in a binary format. Thus only one developer at a time could modify or check out these files, limiting the possibilities for parallel development tasks. Also, Visual SourceSafe could not be used to compare or merge these files, because they were stored as binary. The latest version of Visual SourceSafe treats Unicode-encoded file content, including XML files, as text, allowing your developers to store, compare, and merge these files just like any other text files.




  • File Merge I





    Features:
    • Desktop-based solution for developers working alone or in small teams
    • Manage file branching, file sharing, file merging, and file releases
    • Easily return to a previous version of a file; Unicode and XML support
    • Track versions of entire projects, as well as modular code
    • Provides users with remote Web access over HTTP





    Accessories:
     see more

    Accessories:




    Availability: Usually ships in 2 to 3 days


    Related Items:
         see more

    Related Items:



    banned interdit verboden prohibido vietato proibido
      banned    interdit    verboden   vietato     prohibido    verboden  banned      vietato      interdit proibido   vietato       interdit      verboden      banned  prohibido   

    Your IP has been blocked. Please perform the action below to regain access.

    Code:  security image
    Please enter the Code: 



    Customer Reviews
    Average Rating:






     



      Widescreen Plasma
    Gourmet Food  Reviews




    Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."

    I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.

    I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.

    I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.

    I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.

    Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.

    There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.

    Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants. 

    [a klog apart]


    Blindspots is a continually-updated collection of movie reviews based around one very interesting concept -- how accessible they are to the visually impaired.
    Movies that score high in accessibility include "The American President" (10/10) and "Ghosts of Mississippi" (9/10). At the other end of the scale are "101 Dalmatians", "Buddy", and "Spawn", each receiving 2/10.

    Java Entrepreneur

    Sun Microsystems has announced plans to cut between 5,000 and 6,000 jobs — that's between 15 and 18 percent of its workforce.

    "It blamed the cuts on the global economic downturn, but I think that like many other companies, Sun is using the downturn as an excuse for what were pre-existing problems, foretold by its stock price, which seems to be in an unending swoon," suggests GigaOM's Om Malik.

    "How much has Sun spent to develop Solaris or Java?" asks InfoWorld's Neil McAllister. "How much must it continue to invest in maintaining other products, which, despite being open source, have no appreciable development community? To say these products are not loss leaders suggests something akin to Hollywood accounting."

    The answer? "Spin off Java," McAllister added in a later post. "Just get rid of it — farm it out to an industry consortium and let the companies that depend upon it manage it..."

    More here from CNET News ... more here from the Guardian ... more here from ZDNet ... more here from TG Daily ... and the press release is here.

    See full article.

    Related Entries:

    Sun Microsystems Comes Up With RFID Based Java Net Community Website - 14 May 2006

    Welcome 2007 with Open-Source Java - 25 October 2006

    EarthLink Fires Half of its Workforce - 28 August 2007

    Sprint is Bleeding - 18 January 2008




    Contents of this feed are a property of Creative Weblogging Limited and are protected by copyright laws. Violations will be prosecuted. Please email us if you'd like to use this feed for non-commercial activities at feeds - at - creative-weblogging.com.






    Microsoft Visual SourceSafe 2005 Upgrade

    Shopping